No variable specified
DeKalb could see $1.4 billion raised if TSPLOST passes
by LaTria Garnigan
lgarnigan@neighbornewspapers.com
July 02, 2012 04:25 PM | 1081 views | 3 3 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
One of the key votes that citizens will make on July 31 is whether or not to pass the Regional Transportation Referendum. If passed, the 1-cent Transportation Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax, will help fund regional transportation issues in the Atlanta Regional Commission’s 10-county area, including projects in DeKalb County.

According to Gordon Burkette, legislative coordinator for DeKalb, the county is fairly built out so when inquiring from the public and key stakeholders they concluded the need for capacity projects as for what to put on the project list.

“With that information DeKalb CEO Burrell Ellis and Decatur Mayor Bill Floyd decided that our process would be to emphasize transit and that’s how we came up with the two major transit projects that we have,” said Burkette.

The two major projects include:

- I-20 East bus rapid transit, which is the first portion of the MARTA recommended local alternative for the I-20 corridor. The initial phase is bus rapid transit from downtown Atlanta to the Stonecrest Mall area, also there will be direct service from the same area to Cumberland Mall and also to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

- Clifton corridor is a critical piece of infrastructure in the Emory corridor. Alternative transportation is needed there to alleviate traffic congestion.

“We have some other major projects,” Burkette said. “One of the critical ones is the General Motors site that a lot of people in the county are very interested in seeing be redeveloped. And if you’ve ever seen that site relative to where it is its great it’s very close to a lot of transportation — but there’s not direct contact to any of that.”

The goal with the GM site, according to Burkette, would be a connector road recommended in the Livable Centers Initiative and brought to the process by the city of Doraville as a part of the list to push forward with.

On the amount of projects slated for DeKalb, if the referendum passes, Burkette said there are 16 road projects that are primarily inside DeKalb County. DeKalb is one of two counties (Fulton being the other) that has a significant amount of jobs where citizens actually go to and from work within one county.

With that being said, Burkette mentioned that many of the proposed transportation projects in DeKalb do benefit other bordering counties. For instance, a project at I-85 and 285 will improve ramp movements on I-85 and will involve re-routing the northbound exits at Northcrest Road and Pleasantdale Road. That project will mostly benefit Gwinnett County drivers.

A few other projects included on the long list of possibilities include:

 Ashford Dunwoody Road from SR 141 (Peachtree Road) to I-285 North — this would be a corridor improvement that may include intersection improvements, sidewalk gap elimination, upgrading traffic signals and more.

 U.S. 278 (College Avenue) from Adair Street to North Clarendon Avenue — this would also be a corridor improvement

 North Druid Hills Road from SR 13 (Buford Highway) to U.S. 29 (Lawrenceville Highway) — also a corridor improvement

 Perimeter Center Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Program — this project will deploy advanced technology to improve the communication and operation of more than 70 traffic signals throughout the Perimeter Community Improvement Districts

 Mt. Vernon Road from Fulton County line to Dunwoody Club Drive — this would be a corridor improvement.

Also part of the project list for DeKalb is a few MARTA State of Good Repair projects.

“There are nine of those and these are system wide,” said Burkette. “They’re going to do major train control system upgrades so that controls the speed of the trains.”

Burkette added about 40 percent of the MARTA rail is located in DeKalb.

The total amount of funds that would come to DeKalb County solely from the 1-cent sales tax, if passed, is about $1.4 billion. Other funds would come from the federal government for some projects as well as local matching funds, which would bring the total funding commitment for DeKalb (inclusive of all projects) to about $1.6 billion. These amounts are based on 2011 figures.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
KindlyYours
|
July 16, 2012
I completely disagree with the way this article portrays T-SPLOST to voters in DeKalb. You didn't mention that DeKalb and Fulton are the only two counties in the Metro Area that have already contributed to this tax for the past 39 years, yet DeKalb still isn't getting the rail that was promised years ago.

You didn't mention that there is a clause in the referendum that states that none of the money raised from the tax is allowed to be used on existing facilities, including renovations and repairs in the train stations (which we all know is needed).

There's all this money behind Voting YES for something that makes NO sense. I see kids in South DeKalb County on the side of the street holding up signs to Vote Yes for T-Splost and it's so frustrating to know that they're advocating for something they most likely know absolutely nothing about. All they hear is "creating jobs" and "$1.4 billion for DeKalb". The media can be so misleading sometimes.

ErinRogers
|
July 02, 2012
One of the transportation improvements related to Dekalb County that will be great for the area include improvements that will make it easier to get to and from Stonecrest Mall. The transportation referendum is a comprehensive project that will help to address not only the needs of Atlanta but the metro Atlanta area as well.
anonymous
|
July 05, 2012
No, this bill does not address our needs...far from it. This bill does not address the underlying problem of the lack of present transportation funding (49th in the country) and the greater problem of how to fund future projects. Until we address those issues, we will continue to have problems. The project lists look worthwhile, but why can't we fund it without a referenDUMB? What's so special about these projects that require the entire population to give a straight up/down vote, when all other projects are funded through the gas tax? Due to lack of leadership on both sides, congress has kicked an extremely complex issue down to the voters to decide, and whether it's passed or not, the problems will still exist.

If you drive an electric vehicle, you pay ZERO taxes to help maintain/build our transportation and hybrids pay less than they should. We need a user-mileage fee, as that is the only fair way to pay for transportation. Either that, or scrap the gas tax and use a sales tax to hit everyone. If you really think this "solution" is going to "untie Atlanta", I have a bunch of stuff in the attic to sell you. Voting NO will send a message to our legislature that we want them to do their jobs and figure out how to fund tranportation for good. We've wasted 3 years on this already...time to work on Plan B and get it right this time. Tea Party folks have the right vote this time, but for all the wrong reasons. There is not another option, other than to try again. If this passes, mark my words, the legislature will be addressing the serious problem of transportation funding again very soon, as this bill doesn't solve anything...it just allocates a new tax for a mostly specific list of projects (local gov't gets to use a small portion for whatever projects they wish...no list required for them). The picture of gov't inefficiency.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides